Ronald Arashi and Laurie Arashi v. County of Nevada, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD ARASHI and LAURIE No. 2:25-cv-1753 DAD AC PS
ARASHI,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF NEVADA, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in pro se and have paid the filing fee. This case is accordingly referred to the undersigned for pre-trial matters pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this case. ECF No. 7. Plaintiffs opposed the motion (ECF No. 8) and defendants have replied (ECF No. 12). The motion is fully briefed and was taken under submission. ECF No. 14. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends defendants’ motion to dismiss be GRANTED because this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. I. Background A. The Complaint Plaintiffs are individual citizens of Nevada County, California. ECF No. 1 at 2. Defendant the County of Nevada is a municipal service entity and taxing authority under California law. Id. at 2-3. …