Kaiser
Yuhua Yang v. Polly Kaiser, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YUHUA YANG, No. 2:25-cv-02205-DAD-AC (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART
PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR
14 POLLY KAISER, et al., PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 15 Respondents. 16 17 This matter is before the court on petitioner’s motion for preliminary injunction.1 (Doc. 18 No. 4.) On October 8, 2025, respondents filed their opposition brief and on October 15, 2025, 19 petitioner filed his reply thereto. (Doc. Nos. 21, 22.) On October 18, 2025, the pending motion 20 was taken under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 23.) For the reasons 21 explained below, the court will grant petitioner’s motion for preliminary injunction in part. 22 “The proper legal standard for preliminary injunctive relief requires a party to demonstrate 23 ‘that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the 24 absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an…