(PC)George

Richard Earl George v. Cisneros, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20251:21-cv-00319California1,455 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD EARL GEORGE, Case No. 1:21-cv-00319-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

13 v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

14 CISNEROS, et al., (ECF No. 28)

15 Defendants. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

REQUEST FOR SCREENING OF SECOND

16 AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOOT (ECF No. 27) 17

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO

18 FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

19 THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 20 21 Plaintiff Richard Earl George (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 22 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 23 On October 6, 2025, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 26.) 24 Defendants filed a request for screening of the second amended complaint on October 7, 2025. 25 (ECF No. 27.) 26 On October 9, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.