(PC)George

Richard Earl George v. Cisneros, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20251:21-cv-00319California1,455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD EARL GEORGE, Case No. 1:21-cv-00319-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

CISNEROS, et al., (ECF No. 28)

Defendants. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

REQUEST FOR SCREENING OF SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOOT (ECF No. 27)

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO

FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 20 Plaintiff Richard Earl George (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 6, 2025, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 26.) Defendants filed a request for screening of the second amended complaint on October 7, 2025. (ECF No. 27.) On October 9, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.