Rivers
SHERMARRIE RIVERS v. MARRY ISRAEL, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9 SHERMARRIE RIVERS, Case No. 1:25-cv-01250-SAB
10 Plaintiff, ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF THIS
MATTER TO A DISTRICT JUDGE
11 v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
12 MARRY ISRAEL, et al., RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THIS
ACTION
13 Defendants. (ECF No. 9) 14
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
15 DAYS
16 17 On September 22, 2025, Plaintiff Shermarrie Rivers, who is proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis, filed a complaint against Marry Israel. (ECF No. 1.) On September 23, 2025, the Court 19 granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 4.) On October 8, 2025, 20 the Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to state a claim. (ECF No. 6.) The Court 21 gave Plaintiff leave to amend, and she timely filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) The 22 Court now undertakes screening of the first amended complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 23 As explained herein, the Court will recommend that this matter be dismissed because further leave 24 to amend…