Houff
Charles Houff, et al. v. City of Sacramento, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES HOUFF, et al., No. 2:22-cv-01150-DC-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUESTS TO SEAL
14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., DOCUMENTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
15 Defendants. JUDGMENT AND IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITIONS TO
16 DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
17 (Doc. Nos. 67, 72, 79, 86) 18
19 20 On December 16, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a notice of their request to file under seal 21 documents relating to their motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 67.) Specifically, Plaintiffs 22 seek to file unredacted versions of the following documents under seal: 23 1. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (Doc No. 68); 24 2. Plaintiffs’ statement of undisputed facts in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for 25 summary judgment (Doc. No. 68-1); 26 3. Exhibit A to the declaration of Ben Nisenbaum in support of Plaintiffs’…