Houff
Charles Houff, et al. v. City of Sacramento, et al.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20252:22-cv-01150California1,426 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES HOUFF, et al., No. 2:22-cv-01150-DC-JDP Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUESTS TO SEAL
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., DOCUMENTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
Defendants. JUDGMENT AND IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITIONS TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
17 (Doc. Nos. 67, 72, 79, 86)
19 On December 16, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a notice of their request to file under seal documents relating to their motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 67.) Specifically, Plaintiffs seek to file unredacted versions of the following documents under seal: 1. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (Doc No. 68); 2. Plaintiffs’ statement of undisputed facts in support of Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 68-1); 3. Exhibit A to the declaration of Ben Nisenbaum in support of Plaintiffs’…