Beer
John W. Williams v. Beer, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 JOHN W. WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00155-KES-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 12 MOTION TO ENFORCE A SUBPOENA v.
ISSUED TO DR. MATHEWS WITHOUT
13
PREJUDICE
BEER, et al., 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 115) 15
16 17 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to enforce a subpoena for records requested from 18 Dr. Brandi Mathews, “who was retained by Plaintiff to prepare an expert report that was 19 submitted to the court in support of his mental health diversion plea in his related criminal case.” (ECF No. 115, p. 1). 20 Notably, the subpoena at issue requires production of documents at the following address: 21 Ace Imaging Technologies, Inc. 22 800 S. Figueroa Street 900 Los Angeles, CA 90017 23 (ECF No. 116, at p. 2). 24 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d)(2)(B)(i), if a non-party objects to a 25 subpoena, “at any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the 26 court for the district where compliance is required for an order compelling production or 27 inspection.”…