Bruce Dean Austin v. Infinity Management & Investments, LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20251:25-cv-01171California1,055 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 BRUCE DEAN AUSTIN, Case No. 1:25-cv-01171-KES-SAB

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

13 v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDER, FAILURE TO

14 INFINITY MANAGEMENT & PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO PAY INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., FILING FEE 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 3) 16

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

17 DAYS

18 19 I. 20 BACKGROUND 21 Bruce Dean Austin (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on 22 September 11, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and did not submit an 23 application to proceed in forma pauperis. On September 12, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to 24 either submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee, within twenty- 25 one (21) days of entry of the order. (ECF No. 3.) More than twenty-one days have passed and 26 Plaintiff has not filed an application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.