Bruce Dean Austin v. Infinity Management & Investments, LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20251:25-cv-01171California1,055 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRUCE DEAN AUSTIN, Case No. 1:25-cv-01171-KES-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDER, FAILURE TO

INFINITY MANAGEMENT & PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO PAY INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., FILING FEE 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 3)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 I. BACKGROUND Bruce Dean Austin (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on September 11, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and did not submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On September 12, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee, within twenty- one (21) days of entry of the order. (ECF No. 3.) More than twenty-one days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.