Charles

Quang Vinh Duong v. Marcos Charles

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20251:25-cv-01375California616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

QUANG VINH DUONG, Case No. 1:25-cv-01375-SKO (HC)

ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER AND Petitioner, RESPONDANT TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING v. 14 MARCOS CHARLES,

16 Respondents. _____________________________________/

The Court has reviewed Petitioner Quang Vinh Duong’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 1); motion for temporary restraining order, (Doc. 2); opposition to the motion by Respondents Marcos Charles, Moises Becerra, Kristi Noem, and Pamela Bondi, (Doc. 12); and associated declaration by Deportation Officer Samuel Medina Jr, (Doc. 13 (“Medina Decl.”)), as well as Petitioner’s reply, (Doc. 15). The Court has also reviewed Respondents’ Supplemental Declaration by Acting Supervisor Detention and Deportation Officer Ramiro Sanchez, (Doc. 17 (“Sanchez Decl.”), and Petitioner’s Response, (Doc. 18). Before the Court is able to rule on Petitioner’s motion, the Court requires supplemental briefing from each of the parties as follows: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.