Charles
Quang Vinh Duong v. Marcos Charles
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 QUANG VINH DUONG, Case No. 1:25-cv-01375-SKO (HC)
12 ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER AND Petitioner, RESPONDANT TO SUPPLEMENTAL 13 BRIEFING v. 14 15 MARCOS CHARLES,
16 Respondents. _____________________________________/ 17
18 The Court has reviewed Petitioner Quang Vinh Duong’s amended petition for writ of habeas 19 corpus, (Doc. 1); motion for temporary restraining order, (Doc. 2); opposition to the motion by 20 Respondents Marcos Charles, Moises Becerra, Kristi Noem, and Pamela Bondi, (Doc. 12); and 21 associated declaration by Deportation Officer Samuel Medina Jr, (Doc. 13 (“Medina Decl.”)), as 22 well as Petitioner’s reply, (Doc. 15). The Court has also reviewed Respondents’ Supplemental 23 Declaration by Acting Supervisor Detention and Deportation Officer Ramiro Sanchez, (Doc. 17 24 (“Sanchez Decl.”), and Petitioner’s Response, (Doc. 18). 25 Before the Court is able to rule on Petitioner’s motion, the Court requires supplemental 26 briefing from each of the parties as follows: 27 …