Charles
Quang Vinh Duong v. Marcos Charles
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
QUANG VINH DUONG, Case No. 1:25-cv-01375-SKO (HC)
ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER AND Petitioner, RESPONDANT TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING v. 14 MARCOS CHARLES,
16 Respondents. _____________________________________/
The Court has reviewed Petitioner Quang Vinh Duong’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 1); motion for temporary restraining order, (Doc. 2); opposition to the motion by Respondents Marcos Charles, Moises Becerra, Kristi Noem, and Pamela Bondi, (Doc. 12); and associated declaration by Deportation Officer Samuel Medina Jr, (Doc. 13 (“Medina Decl.”)), as well as Petitioner’s reply, (Doc. 15). The Court has also reviewed Respondents’ Supplemental Declaration by Acting Supervisor Detention and Deportation Officer Ramiro Sanchez, (Doc. 17 (“Sanchez Decl.”), and Petitioner’s Response, (Doc. 18). Before the Court is able to rule on Petitioner’s motion, the Court requires supplemental briefing from each of the parties as follows: …