Raheem Jones, et al. v. City of Sacramento Board of Supervisors, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAHEEM JONES, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-0864-DJC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiffs,

ORDER; FINDINGS AND

13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Defendant City of Sacramento filed a motion to dismiss, which is currently set for hearing 18 on November 6, 2025. ECF Nos. 26 & 28. After plaintiffs failed to timely respond to that 19 motion, I continued the hearing on defendant’s motion and ordered plaintiffs to show cause why 20 sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF 21 No. 28. I also ordered plaintiffs file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s 22 motion by no later than October 16, 2025. Id. I warned plaintiffs that failure to comply with that 23 order could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The deadline has 24 passed, and plaintiffs have not filed an opposition to defendant’s motion or otherwise responded 25 to the court’s…