Raheem Jones, et al. v. City of Sacramento Board of Supervisors, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20252:25-cv-00864California898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAHEEM JONES, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-0864-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs,

ORDER; FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF SACRAMENTO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Defendant City of Sacramento filed a motion to dismiss, which is currently set for hearing on November 6, 2025. ECF Nos. 26 & 28. After plaintiffs failed to timely respond to that motion, I continued the hearing on defendant’s motion and ordered plaintiffs to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 28. I also ordered plaintiffs file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion by no later than October 16, 2025. Id. I warned plaintiffs that failure to comply with that order could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The deadline has passed, and plaintiffs have not filed an opposition to defendant’s motion or otherwise responded to the court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.