Shaun Page v. County of Sacramento, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAUN PAGE, No. 2:25-cv-1706 DJC AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, and pretrial matters are accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and that motion was previously granted. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff’s initial complaint was rejected with leave to amend pursuant to the screening process associated with IFP status. Id. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 5) which is now before the court for screening. I. Screening A. Standards The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is…