Fossum
Timothy Scott Fossum v. Burton, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4
5
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TIMOTHY SCOTT FOSSUM, Case No. 1:25-cv-00203-KES-BAM 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR
11 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 12 BURTON, et al., (Doc. 2) 13 Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
14 15 I. Background 16 Plaintiff Timothy Scott Fossum (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action 17 on February 14, 2025. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff neither paid the $405.00 filing fee nor submitted an 18 application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Accordingly, on 19 September 23, 2025, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to submit a completed and 20 signed application to proceed in forma pauperis or, in the alternative, pay the $405.00 filing fee 21 for this action within thirty days. (Doc. 2.) The Court’s order was returned as “Undeliverable, 22 Attempted-Not Known, Unable to Forward” on October 1, 2025. (See Docket.) 23 II. Discussion 24 …