(SS)Hallier

Jennifer Leigh Hallier v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20251:25-cv-00954California464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENNIFER LEIGH HALLIER, Case No. 1:25-cv-00954-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR

FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

THREE DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

14 On August 4, 2025, Plaintiff initiated this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying an application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) On August 5, 2025, the Court issued a scheduling order. (ECF No. 5.) Pursuant to the scheduling order, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due 30 days after the filing of the administrative record. (Id. at 2.) The administrative record was lodged on October 1, 2025 (ECF No. 9); thus, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due by October 31, 2025. Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief or requested an extension of time to do so. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.