(SS)Hallier

1

2

3

4

5

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 JENNIFER LEIGH HALLIER, Case No. 1:25-cv-00954-SAB

10 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

11 v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR

FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

12 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

THREE DAY DEADLINE

13 Defendant.

14 15 On August 4, 2025, Plaintiff initiated this action seeking judicial review of a final 16 decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying an application for disability benefits 17 pursuant to the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) On August 5, 2025, the Court issued a 18 scheduling order. (ECF No. 5.) Pursuant to the scheduling order, Plaintiff’s opening brief was 19 due 30 days after the filing of the administrative record. (Id. at 2.) The administrative record 20 was lodged on October 1, 2025 (ECF No. 9); thus, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due by October 21 31, 2025. Plaintiff has not filed an opening brief or requested an extension of time to do so. 22 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with…