Wofford

C.A.R.V. v. Minga Wofford, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20251:25-cv-01395California9,003 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 C.A.R.V.,1 Case No. 1:25-CV-01395 JLT SKO 12 Petitioner, ORDER CONVERTING THE MATTER TO A

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

13 v. GRANTING THE PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION IN PART AND REFERRING

14 MINGA WOFFORD, ET AL., THE MATTER TO THE ASSIGNED

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Respondents. (Doc. 2) 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Before the Court for decision is C.A.R.V’s request for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 19 2)filed in conjunction with his petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. 20 §2241 challenging his ongoing immigration detention. (Doc. 1.) Having evaluated the TRO 21 request, Respondents’ opposition (Doc. 9), C.A.R.V’s reply (Doc. 10), and Respondents’ 22 supplemental filing alongside the entire record, the Court converts the matter into a motion for 23 preliminary injunction, GRANTS that motion IN PART, and REFERS the matter to the 24 assigned magistrate judge for a determination on the merits. 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.