Singleton

Steven Quinn Singleton v. Aldridge Pite LLP for Valley Strong Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20251:25-cv-01433California2,229 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN QUINN SINGLETON, Case No.: 1:25-cv-01433-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE REGARDING UNSIGNED

13 v. COMPLAINT, LACK OF SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION, AND

14 ALDRIDGE PITE LLP FOR VALLEY IMPROPER VENUE

STRONG CREDIT UNION,

15 (Doc. 1) Defendant. 16 21-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Steven Quinn Singleton (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a 18 complaint on October 27, 2025. (Doc. 1). 19 Background 20 Plaintiff, using a third-party complaint form, purports to sue “Aldridge Pite LLP for Valley 21 Strong Credit Union.” In the complaint, Plaintiff asserts that “Aldridge Pite LLP used Valley 22 Strong Credit Union, with a principle place of business in Bakersfield, California[,] as a [p]laintiff 23 and intentionally misrepresented numerous elements of a civil matter to obtain a writ of possession 24 on a property. The interstate matter involves multiple…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.