Singleton

Steven Quinn Singleton v. Aldridge Pite LLP for Valley Strong Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20251:25-cv-01433California2,229 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN QUINN SINGLETON, Case No.: 1:25-cv-01433-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE REGARDING UNSIGNED

v. COMPLAINT, LACK OF SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION, AND

ALDRIDGE PITE LLP FOR VALLEY IMPROPER VENUE

STRONG CREDIT UNION,

(Doc. 1) Defendant. 21-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Steven Quinn Singleton (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on October 27, 2025. (Doc. 1). Background Plaintiff, using a third-party complaint form, purports to sue “Aldridge Pite LLP for Valley Strong Credit Union.” In the complaint, Plaintiff asserts that “Aldridge Pite LLP used Valley Strong Credit Union, with a principle place of business in Bakersfield, California[,] as a [p]laintiff and intentionally misrepresented numerous elements of a civil matter to obtain a writ of possession on a property. The interstate matter involves multiple…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.