Kuppinger

Dewayne Thompson v. P. Kuppinger, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20252:23-cv-00463California1,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEWAYNE THOMPSON, No. 2:23-cv-00463-DJC-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER P. KUPPINGER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed objections to the undersigned magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (ECF No. 44), to which defendants have responded. ECF Nos. 45, 46. The objections are largely repetitive of plaintiff’s arguments in both his own motion for summary judgment and in his response to defendants’ motion, which the court will not revisit. However, plaintiff includes new arguments and asserts in his objections that he did not have adequate opportunity to address subparts of Claims 4 and 8. In light of that contention, the court orders further briefing as to those subparts only, which will permit plaintiff to fully address those claims and afford the defendants an opportunity to respond. Although the court confirms its analysis and recommendation as to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.