Warden

Miguel Rodriguez-Garcia v. Warden, FCI-Herlong

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20252:23-cv-00849California290 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00849-TLN-SCR

10 Petitioner, ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET FORTH v. IN GOVERNMENT’S AMENDED NOTICE

WARDEN, FCI-HERLONG,

13 Respondent. 14 15 16 Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b), and based on the representations contained in the Respondent’s Amended Request to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Respondent’s Exhibit 1 to it’s Motion to Dismiss (Renewed) and Further Response, pertaining to Miguel Rodriguez-Garcia, and the Respondent’s Request to Seal shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. It is further ordered that electronic access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the Respondent and counsel for the Petitioner. The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publishing Co. v. U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in the Respondent’s Amended Request, sealing the Respondent’s Request and Exhibit 1 serves a compelling interest. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.