Doe

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JANE DOE (T.R.S.), Case No. 2:23-cv-01676-DAD-CSK 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED 11 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 (ECF No. 102)

WYNDHAM HOTELS AND RESORTS,

13 || INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 17 || 102), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court's Local Rule. See 18 || L.R. 141.1. Finding good cause, the Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the 19 || following clarification. 20 The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 21 jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 22 || 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 23 || (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain 24 ||…