Francisco J. Zamora v. Propak Logistics, LLC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANCISCO J. ZAMORA, Case No. 2:23-cv-2534-DJC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PROPAK LOGISTICS, LLC, 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 17, 2025, the Magistrate 19 Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties 20 and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations 21 were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 23 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 24 are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 25 (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 26 district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 27 the findings and…