Soares

Saladin Rushdan v. Jennifer Soares, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20252:24-cv-01768California1,041 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SALADIN RUSHDAN, No. 2:24-cv-01768-DAD-SCR (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

14 JENNIFER SOARES, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

15 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 2, 8) 16

17 18 Plaintiff Saladin Rushdan is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 19 brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On March 11, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 22 recommending that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (Doc. 23 No. 8 at 3.) Specifically, the magistrate judge concluded that plaintiff had previously filed three 24 actions that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failing to state a claim, and his 25 complaint in this action does not include allegations demonstrating that he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.