Broderick Warfield v. Solano County Superior Court, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20252:25-cv-00557California1,474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRODERICK WARFIELD,

Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-00557-TLN-SCR

13 v. ORDER

SOLANO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,

15 et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Broderick Warfield’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration of this Court’s May 30, 2025 Order and request for a protective order. (ECF No. 30.) No opposition has been filed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion and request. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 18, 2025, Plaintiff filed a complaint against approximately fifteen defendants including law enforcement divisions, state court judges, county prosecutors, and public defenders, concerning two phone calls made to 911 in November of 2011. (ECF No. 1 at 9.) Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on April 10, 2025, and a Second Amended Complaint on May 5, 2025, without leave of court. (ECF Nos. 13, 20.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.