Broderick Warfield v. Solano County Superior Court, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRODERICK WARFIELD,
12 Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-00557-TLN-SCR
13 14 v. ORDER
SOLANO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,
15 et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Broderick Warfield’s (“Plaintiff”) 20 Motion for Reconsideration of this Court’s May 30, 2025 Order and request for a protective 21 order. (ECF No. 30.) No opposition has been filed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court 22 DENIES Plaintiff’s motion and request. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 On February 18, 2025, Plaintiff filed a complaint against approximately fifteen defendants 3 including law enforcement divisions, state court judges, county prosecutors, and public defenders, 4 concerning two phone calls made to 911 in November of 2011. (ECF No. 1 at 9.) Plaintiff filed a 5 First Amended Complaint on April 10, 2025, and a Second Amended Complaint on May 5, 2025, 6 without leave of court. (ECF Nos. 13, 20.) On…