Boersch
Alamin Samad, et al. v. Martha Boersch, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALAMIN SAMAD, et al., No. 2:25-cv-02169-DC-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 MARTHA BOERSCH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Alamin Samad, Derrick White, and Johnny Rice initiated this action with a 18 complaint filed on August 4, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs all filed motions to proceed in forma 19 pauperis. (ECF Nos. 2, 6, 8.) Plaintiffs also filed a motion to appoint counsel and a motion for 20 class certification. (ECF Nos. 3, 4.) On August 21, 2025, the Court found that Plaintiffs had not 21 made the requisite showing to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordered them to pay the filing fee. 22 (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiffs White and Rice each filed a “notice of voluntary dismissal.” (ECF Nos. 23 10, 11.) It is unclear whether these documents are attempting to dismiss these Plaintiffs from the 24 case or whether they are attempting to dismiss the in forma pauperis applications. Plaintiffs White 25 and Rice shall inform the Court whether their notices of…