Orozco

Martin Lee Foster v. Qurrina Orozco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20252:25-cv-02426California584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN LEE FOSTER, No. 2:25-cv-2426 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND QURRINA OROZCO, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil action. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 14, 2025, the court recommended that this action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to either request leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $405 filing fee for this action. As plaintiff filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on October 22 and 24, 2025, the court’s October 14, 2025 findings and recommendations will be vacated. Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. When plaintiff initiated this action he was a Sacramento County Jail prisoner. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) reads as follows: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . [in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.