Bunton
Benjamin Karl Ray Bunton v. Keith Smith, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 BENJAMIN KARL RAY BUNTON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00211-JLT-SAB
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING
13 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
14 KEITH SMITH, et al., ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 12, 2025
HEARING
15 Defendants. (ECF No. 67) 16
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
17 DAYS
18 19 I. 20 INTRODUCTION 21 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss this action for lack of 22 prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court’s orders, brought pursuant to Federal Rule 23 of Civil Procedure 41(b). The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 24 § 636(b)(1)(B). This Court, having reviewed the moving papers, the lack of an opposition brief, 25 and the Court’s record, finds the matter suitable for decision without further briefing or oral 26 argument. See Local Rule 230(c), (g). Accordingly, the hearing set for November 12, 2025, 27 shall be…