Wellpath

Shawn Arlin Donley v. Wellpath, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20251:23-cv-01740California748 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAWN ARLIN DONLEY, No. 1:23-cv-01740-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY DEFENDANTS ALEJANDRA,

13 v. CHLOE, AND LIBBY SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE

14 WELLPATH, et al., SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO

EFFECTUATE SERVICE

15 Defendants. (ECF No. 38) 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Monell claims against Wellpath and County of Madera, 20 and deliberate indifference claims against Chief Manuel Perez, Sheriff Tyson Pogue, Sergeant 21 Khela, Sergeant Quick, Corporal Garza, Corporal Townsend, Sergeant Villanuava, Dr. Gustavian, 22 Medina, Debbie, Eva, Michelle, Maria, Chloe, Alejandra, Victoria, Libby, and Jane Doe. (ECF 23 No. 23.) 24 I. 25 DISCUSSION 26 On June 17, 2025, the Court issued an order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.