Hafer
DeCheri Hafer v. County of Kern, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DECHERI HAFER, Case No. 1:25-cv-00913-KES-CDB
12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS
13 v. ACTION AS TIME-BARRED
14 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., Doc. 9
15 Defendants. 30-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff DeCheri Hafer is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 21 action. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 22 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 23 On September 4, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 24 recommendations to dismiss as time-barred plaintiff’s claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 25 § 1983. Doc. 9 at 6. The magistrate judge separately found that the federal government cannot 26 be a defendant in a section 1983 action and, accordingly, recommended dismissal of defendant 27 United States of America. Id. at 4, 8. The findings and recommendations were served on 28 1 after service.1 Id. at 9. No objections were…