Hafer

DeCheri Hafer v. County of Kern, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20251:25-cv-00913California664 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DECHERI HAFER, Case No. 1:25-cv-00913-KES-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. ACTION AS TIME-BARRED

COUNTY OF KERN, et al., Doc.

Defendants. 30-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff DeCheri Hafer is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 4, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to dismiss as time-barred plaintiff’s claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 9 at 6. The magistrate judge separately found that the federal government cannot be a defendant in a section 1983 action and, accordingly, recommended dismissal of defendant United States of America. Id. at 4, 8. The findings and recommendations were served on 28 after service. Id. at 9. No objections were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.