Hunter

Tyrell Ainsworth v. R. Hunter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20252:24-cv-01347California782 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYRELL AINSWORTH, No. 2:24-cv-01347-DAD-CSK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

14 R. HUNTER, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REVOKE

PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS

15 Defendant. STATUS 16 (Doc. Nos. 37, 45) 17 18 19 Plaintiff Tyrell Ainsworth is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 20 brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 21 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On April 10, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 23 recommending that defendant R. Hunter’s motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status be 24 granted. (Doc. No. 45 at 8.) Specifically, the magistrate judge concluded that plaintiff had 25 previously filed three actions that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failing to state a 26 claim,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.