Covello

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MINH KHA HOANG PHAN, 12 Petitioner, No. 2:24-cv-3309-TLN-SCR 13 v. 14 P. COVELLO, ORDER 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Minh Kha Hoang Phan (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed 18 an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred 19 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 30, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. This deadline has passed, 23 and neither party has filed objections. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)…