Tung Duy Nguyen v. California Superior Court of SAC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20252:25-cv-01558California1,964 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TUNG DUY NGUYEN, No. 2:25-cv-1558 AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT OF

SAC,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff paid the filing fee and is proceeding in this action pro se, and accordingly the case was initially referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The parties subsequently consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction for all purposes. ECF No. 10. Defendant has moved to dismiss the case. ECF No. 9. The matter is fully briefed, ECF Nos. 11 (opposition), 12 (reply), and has been submitted on the papers, ECF No. 13. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. I. Background A. The Complaint Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 4, 2025, alleging that the Superior Court of Sacramento, in collusion with the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), violated his civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.