Tung Duy Nguyen v. California Superior Court of SAC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TUNG DUY NGUYEN, No. 2:25-cv-1558 AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT OF

SAC,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff paid the filing fee and is proceeding in this action pro se, and accordingly the 18 case was initially referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The parties 19 subsequently consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction for all purposes. ECF No. 10. 20 Defendant has moved to dismiss the case. ECF No. 9. The matter is fully briefed, ECF 21 Nos. 11 (opposition), 12 (reply), and has been submitted on the papers, ECF No. 13. For the 22 reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is 23 directed to close this case. 24 I. Background 25 A. The Complaint 26 Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 4, 2025, alleging that the Superior Court of 27 Sacramento, in collusion with the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), violated his civil…