Barnes
Christina Marie Evers v. Ryan Barnes, Jimmy Escajeda, and Tanya Aker
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTINA MARIE EVERS, No. 2:25-cv-2094-DC-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
RYAN BARNES, JIMMY ESCAJEDA, and TANYA AKER, 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was accordingly referred to the undersigned. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and submitted the affidavit required by that statute. ECF No. 2; see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The District Judge assigned to this case has also referred Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) to the undersigned. ECF Nos. 3-4. The motion to proceed IFP, ECF No. 2, will be granted. Upon screening the Complaint, however, the Court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction and recommends dismissal without leave to amend, and recommends dismissal of the TRO for the same reason. I. LEGAL STANDARD A court may authorize a person to…