Barnes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTINA MARIE EVERS, No. 2:25-cv-2094-DC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 RYAN BARNES, JIMMY ESCAJEDA, and TANYA AKER, 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 20 (“IFP”) and submitted the affidavit required by that statute. ECF No. 2; see 28 U.S.C. § 21 1915(a)(1). The District Judge assigned to this case has also referred Plaintiff’s Motion for a 22 Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) to the undersigned. ECF Nos. 3-4. 23 The motion to proceed IFP, ECF No. 2, will be granted. Upon screening the Complaint, 24 however, the Court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction and recommends dismissal 25 without leave to amend, and recommends dismissal of the TRO for the same reason. 26 I. LEGAL STANDARD 27 A court may authorize a person to…