Lucio Justo Ramos Carrillo v. Dutch Embassy, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUCIO JUSTO RAMOS CARRILLO, Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-2311-TLN-CKD P v. DUTCH EMBASSY, et al., ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Lucio Justo Ramos Carrillo (“Plaintiff”), a San Joaquin County Jail prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 26, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 6.) This deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey,…