Peraino
Richard Peraino, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. DNC Parks & Resorts at Tenaya, Inc. et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD PERAINO, individually and Case No.: 25-cv-1130-JES-DEB on behalf of others similarly situated, 12
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiffs, 13 REMAND v. 14 [ECF No. 10]
DNC PARKS & RESORTS AT
15 TENAYA, INC. et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to remand the case to state court. ECF 19 No. 10. Defendants filed an opposition and Plaintiffs filed a reply. ECF Nos. 12, 16. On 20 June 18, 2025, the Court held a motion hearing, took the matters under submission, and 21 ordered the parties to file supplemental briefing. ECF No. 14. The parties filed 22 supplemental briefs in accordance with that order. ECF Nos. 21-22. After due consideration 23 and for the reasons discussed below, the motion to remand is DENIED. 24 I. BACKGROUND 25 On March 28, 2025, Plaintiff Richard Peraino (“Peraino”), on behalf of himself 26 individually and others similarly situated, initiated a wage and hour class action lawsuit in 27 the Superior…