Peraino

Richard Peraino, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. DNC Parks & Resorts at Tenaya, Inc. et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20251:25-cv-01481California9,206 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD PERAINO, individually and Case No.: 25-cv-1130-JES-DEB on behalf of others similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, REMAND v. 14 [ECF No. 10]

DNC PARKS & RESORTS AT

15 TENAYA, INC. et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to remand the case to state court. ECF No. 10. Defendants filed an opposition and Plaintiffs filed a reply. ECF Nos. 12, 16. On June 18, 2025, the Court held a motion hearing, took the matters under submission, and ordered the parties to file supplemental briefing. ECF No. 14. The parties filed supplemental briefs in accordance with that order. ECF Nos. 21-22. After due consideration and for the reasons discussed below, the motion to remand is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On March 28, 2025, Plaintiff Richard Peraino (“Peraino”), on behalf of himself individually and others similarly situated, initiated a wage and hour class action lawsuit in the Superior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.