Johal

Lamar Paschall v. Amandeep Johal, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20251:24-cv-00154California1,449 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMAR PASCHALL, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00154-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT SINCLAIR OR ST. CLAIR

v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FROM THIS

ACTION FOR A FAILURE TO PROVIDE

AMANDEEP JOHAL, et al.,

SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO

Defendants. EFFECTUATE SERVICE

30-DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Lamar Paschall is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On June 5, 2025, the Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate. (Doc. 18.) The Court ordered the United States Marshal (USM) to serve Defendants “Law Fu, M.D.,” “Smith, M.D.,” and “Sinclair, M.D.,” allegedly employed at the Sierra Conservation Center (SCC) in Jamestown. (Id. at 1-2.) On June 9, 2025, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) filed its notice of intent to waive service as to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.