Johal
Lamar Paschall v. Amandeep Johal, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMAR PASCHALL, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00154-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANT SINCLAIR OR ST. CLAIR
v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FROM THIS
ACTION FOR A FAILURE TO PROVIDE
AMANDEEP JOHAL, et al.,
SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO
Defendants. EFFECTUATE SERVICE
30-DAY DEADLINE
18 Plaintiff Lamar Paschall is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On June 5, 2025, the Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate. (Doc. 18.) The Court ordered the United States Marshal (USM) to serve Defendants “Law Fu, M.D.,” “Smith, M.D.,” and “Sinclair, M.D.,” allegedly employed at the Sierra Conservation Center (SCC) in Jamestown. (Id. at 1-2.) On June 9, 2025, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) filed its notice of intent to waive service as to…