Clendenin
Thomas Bodnar v. Stephanie Clendenin, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS BODNAR, Case No.: 1:25-cv-01019-SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
13 v. (Doc. 2) 14 STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al.,
15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Thomas Bodnar, a civil detainee, is appearing pro se in this civil rights action. 18 Following reassignment to the undersigned on October 6, 2025, (see Doc. 6), and a review 19 of the docket for this action, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 20 pauperis. (Doc. 2.) 21 Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 22 are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 23 Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). Examination of Plaintiff’s application 24 reveals that Plaintiff is unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, the motion to 25 proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27 Dated: November 5, 2025 …