Mayorkas

Ruth E. Ortaga Torres v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20252:25-cv-00563California1,117 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUTH E. ORTAGA TORRES, No. 2:25-cv-00563-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS FOR

13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

14 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Ruth E. Ortaga Torres is proceeding in this action with counsel.1 On February 18, 18 2025, plaintiff filed her complaint. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not taken any further action in this 19 case. See Docket. On October 10, 2025, the Court ordered plaintiff to file a status report within 20 fourteen days updating the Court on the status of the case, and to show cause why the case should 21 not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s 22 order, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. 23 I. Legal Standards 24 A district court may impose sanctions, including involuntary dismissal of a plaintiff’s case 25 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), where that plaintiff fails to prosecute his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.