Mayorkas

Ruth E. Ortaga Torres v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20252:25-cv-00563California1,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUTH E. ORTAGA TORRES, No. 2:25-cv-00563-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Ruth E. Ortaga Torres is proceeding in this action with counsel.1 On February 18, 2025, plaintiff filed her complaint. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not taken any further action in this case. See Docket. On October 10, 2025, the Court ordered plaintiff to file a status report within fourteen days updating the Court on the status of the case, and to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s order, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. I. Legal Standards A district court may impose sanctions, including involuntary dismissal of a plaintiff’s case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), where that plaintiff fails to prosecute his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.