Adams

Dolores Lucero v. Daniel Adams, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20252:25-cv-01267California1,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOLORES LUCERO, Case No. 2:25-cv-1267-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DANIEL ADAMS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Dolores Lucero filed this action against defendant Daniel Adams, alleging that defendant breached a contract by failing to make repairs to plaintiff’s residential property. After filing an answer, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff has moved to strike defendant’s answer and to amend her complaint. ECF Nos. 10 & 11. The court will grant plaintiff’s motion to amend and deny the remaining motions as moot. Additionally, because plaintiff’s amended complaint, like her original one, fails to sufficiently allege a basis for the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, I will also order plaintiff to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. I. Motion to Amend Plaintiff filed her motion for leave to amend her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.