Adams

Dolores Lucero v. Daniel Adams, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20252:25-cv-01267California1,115 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOLORES LUCERO, Case No. 2:25-cv-1267-TLN-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DANIEL ADAMS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Dolores Lucero filed this action against defendant Daniel Adams, alleging that 18 defendant breached a contract by failing to make repairs to plaintiff’s residential property. After 19 filing an answer, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff has moved to 20 strike defendant’s answer and to amend her complaint. ECF Nos. 10 & 11. The court will grant 21 plaintiff’s motion to amend and deny the remaining motions as moot. Additionally, because 22 plaintiff’s amended complaint, like her original one, fails to sufficiently allege a basis for the 23 court’s subject matter jurisdiction, I will also order plaintiff to show cause, within fourteen days, 24 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 25 I. Motion to Amend 26 Plaintiff filed her motion for leave to amend her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.