Edward Harry Constable v. United States District Court

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD HARRY CONSTABLE, No. 2:25-cv-1434 AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 19 Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford 20 the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 21 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 22 The petition indicates that petitioner is challenging his credit-earning rate and alleges that 23 petitioner was convicted of a serious non-violent felony and was “sentenced to 1/3rd mid term on 24 a prop 57 case” and that he “should have 50% or 1/2 credit term rating” and that “[t]he judge 25 sentenced [him] to this.” ECF No. 1 at 2-3. 26 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases…