Wesley Yielding, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WESLEY YIELDING, et al., No. 2:25-cv-02643-TLN-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The three plaintiffs in this action are proceeding pro se. A recent court order was served 18 on each plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiffs 19 have failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria 20 persona inform the court of any address change. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for each 22 plaintiff’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 23 110. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiffs may file…