Santoro
Rudolph Ellis v. Santoro, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDOLPH ELLIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01539-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
v. FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY
COURT OF WILLINGNESS TO PROCEED
SANTORO, et al., ON COGNIZABLE CLAIMS
Defendants. (ECF No. 19)
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Rudolph Ellis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 9, 2025, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff’s first amended complaint states a cognizable claim against Defendants B. Gutierrez, A. Urquieto, and J. Rivera for excessive force for being pepper sprayed and against A. Flores for kicking Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment, but failed to state any other cognizable claims for relief. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff was directed to file a second…