Alvarez

Rodney C. Buckley, Jr. v. G. Alvarez, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20251:22-cv-01514California1,078 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY C. BUCKLEY, JR., Case No.: 1:22-cv-01514-CDB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS DEFENDANT MACABITAS

13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

14 G. ALVAREZ, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

15 Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

16

17 Plaintiff Rodney C. Buckley, Jr., is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 On August 13, 2025, the Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate. (Doc. 27.) 21 Specifically, it ordered the United States Marshal (USM) to serve Defendants Alipaz, Alvarez, 22 Connor, Hickerson, and Macabitas. (Id. at 1-2.) 23 Thereafter, on September 17, 2025, the California Department of Corrections and 24 Rehabilitation (CDCR) filed its notice of intent to waive service as to Defendants Alipaz, 25 Alvarez, Connor, and Hickerson. (Doc. 29 [sealed].)1 That same date, CDCR filed a notice of 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.