Elreich
Ahmad Abu Elreich v. Waymo LLC, et. al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AHMAD ABU ELREICH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00814-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING PROOF OF SERVICE
v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
RETURN SERVICE FORMS
WAYMO LLC, et. al., (Doc. No. 21) Defendants.
TEN-DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. (Doc. No. 1). On August 1, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and determined it stated a claim against Defendants Waymo LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc. for patent infringement sufficient to withstand screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Doc. No. 13 at 1). The Court directed Plaintiff to complete and return service documents so service of Plaintiff’s FAC could be effectuated upon Defendants. (Doc. No. 13 at 2). On October 17, 2025, Plaintiff was granted an extension of time to return the service documents. (Doc. No. 19 at 1). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 governs the commencement of…