Slote

Kimberly R. Olson v. Patricia Slote, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20252:16-cv-00956California2,745 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY R. OLSON, No. 2:16-CV-0956-DC-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 14 PARTICIA SLOTE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. This court conducted a 18 scheduling conference on November 5, 2025, before the undersigned. Plaintiff failed to appear. 19 Attorney Michael Maloney, Esq., appeared on behalf of all answering Defendants. Pursuant to 20 Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court issues this scheduling order. 21 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 22 In an effort to clarify the status of service of the named defendants and their 23 representation, the Court provides the following procedural history. This action currently 24 proceeds on the second amended complaint. See ECF Nos. 18, 22, and 27. The following are 25 named as defendants: (1) Patricia Slote; (2) Melissa Peterson (formerly Tulledo)1; (3) Roger 26 Puckett; (4) Julie Bowles; (5) Clint Dingman; (6) Ernest Goff;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.