Slote

Kimberly R. Olson v. Patricia Slote, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20252:16-cv-00956California2,745 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBERLY R. OLSON, No. 2:16-CV-0956-DC-DMC Plaintiff, v. SCHEDULING ORDER PARTICIA SLOTE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. This court conducted a scheduling conference on November 5, 2025, before the undersigned. Plaintiff failed to appear. Attorney Michael Maloney, Esq., appeared on behalf of all answering Defendants. Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court issues this scheduling order. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY In an effort to clarify the status of service of the named defendants and their representation, the Court provides the following procedural history. This action currently proceeds on the second amended complaint. See ECF Nos. 18, 22, and 27. The following are named as defendants: (1) Patricia Slote; (2) Melissa Peterson (formerly Tulledo)1; (3) Roger Puckett; (4) Julie Bowles; (5) Clint Dingman; (6) Ernest Goff;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.