Anzar

Ray Medina v. Anzar, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20252:25-cv-00475California7,443 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAY MEDINA, No. 2:25-cv-0475 DC AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANZAR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18 without a lawyer. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”), 19 request to proceed in forma pauperis, request for screening, and a motion to disqualify the 20 undersigned. ECF Nos. 2, 8, 14, 16. Because plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that 21 he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is 22 granted.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); ECF Nos. 2, 4. For the reasons discussed below, 23 plaintiff’s request for screening and motion to disqualify the undersigned will be denied. 24 1 This means that plaintiff is allowed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in monthly installments that 25 are taken from the inmate’s trust account rather than in one lump sum. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.