Valenta Duncan v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VALENTA DUNCAN, No. 2:25-cv-0908-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant. 16 Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants Alameda County Sheriff’s Department and County of Sacramento1 moved to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”). Because plaintiff proceeds pro se, this matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). As set forth below, plaintiff has not opposed the motion to dismiss by Alameda County Sheriff’s Department after being specifically cautioned that failure to do so would be deemed as consent to grant the motion to dismiss. Thus, the undersigned recommends plaintiff’s claims against Alameda County Sheriff’s Department be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). As to County of Sacramento’s motion, the undersigned recommends the motion to dismiss be…