Karan Tandon v. Coinbase, Inc., et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KARAN TANDON, Case No. 2:25-cv-02111-DJC-CSK PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

14 COINBASE, INC., et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 6) 16 17 Plaintiff Karan Tandon, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action against 18 Defendants Coinbase, Inc. (“Coinbase”), Google LLC (“Google”), and John Dee.1 (ECF 19 No. 1.) Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “emergency motion for injunctive relief to 20 stay all collection activities pending resolution of litigation.” (ECF No. 6.) The Court 21 construes this as a motion for a temporary restraining order pursuant to Federal Rule of 22 Civil Procedure 65. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Court submits the motion upon 23 the record and briefs on file 24 For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends DENYING Plaintiff’s motion. 25 Further, the Docket reflects that Plaintiff has paid the filing fee in this action. See Docket. 26 …