Karan Tandon v. Coinbase, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20252:25-cv-02111California1,890 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARAN TANDON, Case No. 2:25-cv-02111-DJC-CSK PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

COINBASE, INC., et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY Defendants. (ECF No. 6) 16 Plaintiff Karan Tandon, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action against Defendants Coinbase, Inc. (“Coinbase”), Google LLC (“Google”), and John Dee.1 (ECF No. 1.) Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “emergency motion for injunctive relief to stay all collection activities pending resolution of litigation.” (ECF No. 6.) The Court construes this as a motion for a temporary restraining order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Court submits the motion upon the record and briefs on file For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends DENYING Plaintiff’s motion. Further, the Docket reflects that Plaintiff has paid the filing fee in this action. See Docket. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.