Alisa Razumovsky v. Nelnet Servicing LLC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALISA RAZUMOVSKY, Case No. 2:25-cv-02257-DAD-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AS PREMATURE

14 NELNET SERVICING LLC,

15 Defendant. (ECF No. 5) 16 17 Plaintiff Alisa Razumovsky, who is proceeding pro se, has moved to proceed in 18 forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action. (ECF No. 2.) After determining whether IFP is 19 appropriate and granting IFP, the Court must screen the complaint and dismiss any 20 claims that are frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted, 21 or seek monetary relief against an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff's 22 Complaint, which was filed on August 11, 2025, has not yet been screened; thus, the 23 Court has not yet determined whether the Complaint states any cognizable claim(s). See 24 Docket. In addition, on October 10, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a signed 25 Complaint within 30 days from the date of the order. See 10/10/2025 Order…