Alisa Razumovsky v. Nelnet Servicing LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20252:25-cv-02257California363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALISA RAZUMOVSKY, Case No. 2:25-cv-02257-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AS PREMATURE

NELNET SERVICING LLC,

Defendant. (ECF No. 5) 16 Plaintiff Alisa Razumovsky, who is proceeding pro se, has moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action. (ECF No. 2.) After determining whether IFP is appropriate and granting IFP, the Court must screen the complaint and dismiss any claims that are frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief against an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff's Complaint, which was filed on August 11, 2025, has not yet been screened; thus, the Court has not yet determined whether the Complaint states any cognizable claim(s). See Docket. In addition, on October 10, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a signed Complaint within 30 days from the date of the order. See 10/10/2025 Order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.