C.T.

C.T., et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORP., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20251:23-cv-01769California868 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 C.T., et al., individually and on behalf of all Case No. 1:23-cv-01769-KES-CDB others similarly situated,

12

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW

Plaintiff,

CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT

13

BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO

v.

MEET AND CONFER REGARDING THE

14

MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORP., et

15 al., (Docs. 70, 71, 72)

16 Defendants. 5-Day Deadline

17 18 Background 19 Plaintiffs C.T. and Judy Martinez (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this action with the 20 filing of a complaint on December 26, 2023. (Doc. 1). On March 28, 2024, the Plaintiffs filed a 21 motion to proceed under pseudonym. (Doc. 15). The next day, the Court struck the motion for 22 violation of the Court’s Local Rules and the assigned District Judge’s Standing Order in Civil 23 Cases, as a result of Plaintiffs’ failure to file a notice of motion that contains a certification by 24 counsel that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a summary thereof. (Doc. 16). 25 The Court issued the Class Certification…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.