Travis Justin Cuellar v. The Madera County Sheriff Jail Division, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20251:25-cv-00302California2,164 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

BACKGROUND

22 Plaintiff filed the instant complaint in this action on March 12, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) 23 On June 27, 2025, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a 24 cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF 25 No. 7.) 26 Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on July 10, 2025. (ECF No. 9.) On July 24, 2025, 27 the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted 28 1 Plaintiff one final opportunity amend the complaint. 2 In lieu of filing an amended complaint, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration 3 requesting to proceed on his first amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff’s motion for 4 reconsideration was denied on September 2, 2025, and Plaintiff was granted thirty days thereafter 5 to file a second amended complaint, if he so desired. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff failed to file a 6 second amended complaint. Therefore, on October 14, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show 7 cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has not filed a response 8 and the time to do so has passed. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.