Wofford

O.P.A.M. v. MINGA WOFFORD, ET AL.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20251:25-cv-01423California8,491 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 O.P.A.M., Case No. 1:25-cv-01423 JLT SAB

12 Petitioner, ORDER CONVERTING THE MATTER TO A

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

13 v. GRANTING THE PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION2

14 MINGA WOFFORD, ET AL.,1 (Doc. 2) 15 Respondents. 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Before the Court for decision is O.P.A.M.’s request for a temporary restraining order 18 (“TRO”) (Doc. 2) filed in conjunction with his petition for writ of habeas corpus brought under 19 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his ongoing immigration detention (Doc. 1). Having evaluated the 20 TRO request, Respondents’ opposition (Doc. 11), and O.P.A.M.’s reply (Doc. 12), the Court 21 converts the matter into a motion for preliminary injunction (“PI”) and GRANTS that motion. 22 /// 23 1 Respondents appear to suggest that Petitioner has not sued Mesa Verde’s warden. (Doc. 11 at 6.) Clearly, Petitioner 24 has attempted to do so. If Respondent is suggesting that the Warden has changed, the Court has been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.