Mathis

Russell Mathis, Jordan Chong Moua, Ying Susanna Va, Mai Nou Vang, and all others similarly situated v. County of Siskiyou and Jeremiah Larue, in his official capacity as Sheriff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20252:22-cv-01378California4,573 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUSSELL MATHIS, JORDAN CHONG No. 2:22-cv-01378 KJM AC

MOUA, YING SUSANNA VA, MAI

12 NOU VANG, and all others similarly situated, 13 ORDER Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 COUNTY OF SISKIYOU and JEREMIAH 16 LARUE, in his official capacity as Sheriff, 17 Defendants. 18 19 This case is before the court on three discovery motions: plaintiffs’ motion to increase 20 deposition limits (ECF No. 150; joint statement at ECF No. 171), plaintiffs’ motion for remedy of 21 violation of discovery substantial completion deadline (ECF No. 157; joint statement at ECF No. 22 172), and plaintiffs’ motion to compel the deposition of Ray Haupt (ECF No. 167; joint statement 23 at ECF No. 174). These discovery motions were referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. 24 Cal. R. 302(c)(1). The motions are fully briefed and were taken under submission. ECF No. 175. 25 I. Relevant Case Background 26 The factual background of the case is well known to the parties and the court and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.