Bisch

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL BISCH, No. 2:23-cv-00455-DC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY of YOLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed an administrative motion (ECF No. 65) (the “Motion”) concerning the 18 record on Defendants’ Motion to Strike (the “MTS”) (ECF No. 40). Defendants oppose the 19 Motion. ECF No. 68. The court held a specially set hearing on the motion on November 6, 2025, 20 and took the Motion under submission at the conclusion of the hearing. Based on the parties’ 21 briefs and argument at the hearing, the Court understands that Plaintiff requests leave to submit 22 the following: (1) additional exhibits in support of Plaintiff’s opposition to the MTS, in the form 23 of evidentiary documents and transcripts of witness testimony concerning those exhibits from 24 Plaintiff’s state court trial; and (2) the state court’s determination at trial of a privilege question 25 that is also at issue in the MTS. As explained below, the Court…